PSYCHOSOCIAL RESPONSES TO PHYSICAL ILLNESS
MIND AND BODY GO TOGETHER, MOVE TOGETHER, GET WELL TOGETHER AND GET SICK TOGETHER
The Healer within : The new medicine of mind and body
American Board of Internal Medicine requires internists
to be able to "recognize and be attentive the patient's emotional
needs and recognize their potential influence on the symptoms and
course of the illness."
Psychosocial reaction to illness refers to a set of cog-
nitive, emotional and behavioural responses induced in every sick
person by all the illness-related information they receive.
3 Main sources of information
1. somatic perceptions
2. the patient's own knowledge of and beliefs about
disease
3. messages from the social environment especially the
doctor's statements
3 Key components of psychosocial reaction
1. meaning of illness
2. emotional responses to illness
3. coping with illness
MEANING OF ILLNESS
"Meaning" connotes the subjective significance for the
patient of all the illness-related information that impinges on
him or her.
4 Major categories of meaning
1. challenge or threat
The usual behviour responses are flight, fight and
withdrawal.
2. loss
"Loss" mean both concrete and symbolic. Concrete losses
involve body parts and functions. Symbolic ones concern personally
significant values and needs, such as security, pleasure, gratifi-
cation and self-esteem.
Abnormal emotional response to loss is grief.
The coping behaviours associated with grief may include
withdrawal, helpless attention-seeking, hostile confrontations,
noncompliance, substance abuse and suicide.
3. gain or relief
For some patients being ill signifies, consciously or not,
a welcome respite from the demands and responsibilities of social
roles or from a difficult interpersonal situation or economic hard-
ship. Illness may also help attenuate an inner conflict. Noncom-
pliance with treatment is common in such patients, some may manifest
conversion symptoms and generally cling to the sick role. Doctors
tend to resent such patients : they make them feel ineffectual and
helpless.
4. punishment
The patient may regard the illness as either a just or an
unjust punishment. The emotion may range from depression and shame
to anger or elation.
If the patient views the illness as a just punishment, then
he or she may surrender to it passively or even eagerly. He or she
often make no attempt to get well or may even die despite effective
treatment. By contrast, if he or she views as unjust punishment, it
likely to be anger and bitterness. Hostile, litigious or even
paranoid behaviour may result. Hope, optimism and occasionally even elation may result when he or she views it as just punishment.
4 Determinants of meaning
1. Intrapersonal factors include personality, past
experience and emotional state at the onset of illness. The indi-
vidual's emotional state at the time of illness onset is likely to
influence the evolved meaning of illness. Augmenters are also more
likely to view illness as a threat or loss than are the reducers,
whose easier to disregard or even deny.
2. Interpersonal factors include (1) support from family
members and (2) a good doctor-patient relationship. These factors
protect one against adverse effects of stressful life events.
3. Illness-related factors Generally the greater personal
value of the lost or disorders body part or function is for the pat-
ient, the more likely it is that the illness is seen as a grave threat or loss.
4. Sociocultural and economic factors include beliefs
about, attitudes toward illness and social stigmata. If the economic
consequences of illness lead to a lowering of the patient's standard
of living or to abandonment of life goals, then the illness is a
strongly negative appraisal.
EMOTIONAL RESPONSES TO ILLNESS
The commonest emotions are anxiety, grief, depression, shame, guilt and anger. They vary in quality, intensity, duration,
physiologic concomitants and appropriateness to the objective aspects
of the illness and situation.
These emotional responses may elicit maladaptive defense
mechanisms, such as denial or regression, which may make the patient
noncompliant, excessively dependent or drug/alcohol abuse.
What matters in practice is the impact of the evoked emotions on the patient's illness and distress as well as on his or
her behaviour.
Thus, emotional responses have an important effect on the
patient's manner of coping mechanism and ultimately on its course and
outcome.
COPING WITH ILLNESS
How a patient copes with the illness reflects his or her
habitual tendencies to deal with stressful life events in indivi-
dually characteristic ways.
2 Coping styles (in cognitive sphere)
1. Minimization implies a tendency to habitually play
down the personal significance and emotional impact of a stressful
event.
2. Vigilant focusing is a tendency to respond with a
heigh level of attention and concern that may range from purposeful
and rational to exaggerated and obsessive.
3. Coping styles (in behavioural sphere)
1. Tackling means actively dealing with stressful events
and illness.
2. Capitulating is to submit to such events and being
passive or overly dependent.
3. Avoiding means attempting to get away from event by
withdrawing or fleeing.
The dominant coping styles are reflected in his or her
communication and action. The timing of seeking medical advice and
the manner and language with which the patient deals with the sick
role are all overt manifestations of coping styles and related
strategies.
PATIENT'EMOTION
The patient-doctor relationship is one that usually color
the relationship. Most patient are able to accept dependency on
their doctor. In general, patients with unresolved dependency
conflicts may be divided into two groups : overt dependency and
independent focade which was the reaction formation from fear of it.
|
Overt dependency |
Independent facade |
|
# excessive dependency on parents - often only child - childhood illness - overconcern by insecure # frustrated dependency needs - large family - lack of love - rejecting parents |
# fearful of helplessness - rejection as child # ashamed of helplessness - pushed to independent by parents |
Some patients may be anxiety, anger, hostile, regression or
depression.
Stages of dying
Elizabeth Klubler-Ross (1969) presented five stages of dying.
1. Denial "No, not me"
2. Anger "Why me?" "I'm still alive"
3. Bargaining "Yes, me, but."
4. Depression "Yes, me." "It's very sad."
5. Acceptance "Yes, me."
Now we recognize that these five stages do not occur with predictable regularity.
References
1. Martin MJ. Psychiatry and medicine. In: Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ,
Freedman AM, eds. Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry.
Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins, 1975:2030-41.
2. Milano MR, Kornfeld DS. Thanatology. In: Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ,
Freedman AM, eds. Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry.
Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins, 1975:2042-55.
3. Lipowski ZJ. Psychosocial reaction to physical illness. Can Med
Assoc J 1983; 128:1069-72.
4. Lipowski AJ. Psychosocial aspects of disease. Ann Intern Med
1969; 71(6) : 1197-206.
----------------
Voralaksana Theeramoke, M.D.
Department of Psychiatry,
Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital.